Hi harry ,
Thanks for the tip withthe new bootcamp 1.1 ( on the website is only the
older 1.02 version posted so will try .
Regards
Holger
> Von: Harry Bardak <hb_xsimailinglist(at)hotmail.com>
> Antworten an: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
> Datum: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:15:58 +0200
> An: Holger Weiss <xsi(at)Softimage.COM>
> Betreff: RE: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
>
> actually there is an update for bootcamp.
> You have new apple drivers.
> The keyboard is fully working. they add a the right click too.
> the camera and the speaker is working now.
>
>
> Harry Bardak
> TD / Compositor.
>
> Http://perso.wanadoo.fr/harry.bardak/
> +33 6 76 63 35 54
> +44 781 661 4147
>
> ----------------------------------------
>> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:45:02 +0200
>> Subject: Re: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
>> From: holgi(at)mark13.com
>> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
>>
>> I use a macbookpro 2.16 ghz with xsi (under win xp sp2) and it runs all fine
>> ( sometimes you need to wait longer for your renderegion), the one thing i
>> was a little was the grapficcard (ati x1600) but all is fine ( do a lot of
>> setups and rigging , so i don´t know how simulations run ( will test it and
>> maybe give it a qote)
>> I like the macbook pro , thing is under xp you haven´t yet the camera and
>> micro (build in) :(
>> but hopefully when bootcamp will be there you can easily switch between the
>> systems
>> Another thing is it is faster in photoshop than my workstation amd dual
>> core 4600+
>> Maybe one thing to mention, cause of the keyboard ( i use remap ) to get
>> access to things like alt gr and other window specific stuff
>> So if somebody have questions about the macbook (pro) don´t hasitate
>>
>> Holger
>>
>>
>>
>>> Von: Luc-Eric Rousseau <lucer(at)Softimage.COM>
>>> Antworten an: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
>>> Datum: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:25:47 -0400
>>> An: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
>>> Unterhaltung: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
>>> Betreff: RE: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
>>>
>>> The only reason why I know the answer to this is that I've read discussions
>>> on
>>> this subject, I'm not saying any of this is obvious...
>>>
>>> ...but it's not possible to run Linux binaries under OSX because of the
>>> binary
>>> interface, which includes the work the linker does, the functions,
>>> libraries,
>>> and the format of the executables. OS X only supports its own binary format
>>> ("Mach-0") for executable, and Apple doesn't have the linux "emulation" that
>>> is, as you mention, in many other BSD variation to make the linux executable
>>> thinks it's running a normal linux.
>>>
>>> btw, OS X has a significantly modified BSD, with they have their own
>>> versions
>>> of gcc and file system locations, which probably complicates the matter.
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Alan Jones
>>>>
>>>> OS X is based on a BSD if I recall. A few of the BSDs have support for
>>>> running linux binaries. I believe it's a kernel component and seeing
>>>> Apple have decided to make the kernel source available for the x86
>>>> architecture again I'd imagine that even if it's not in the standard
>>>> kernel it would be possible to port it relatively easily.
>>>>
>>>> On 8/28/06, Luc-Eric Rousseau <lucer(at)softimage.com> wrote:
>>>>> why would this be possible at all, OS X isn't based
>>>>> on linux. you'd have more chance running XSI Windows
>>>>> under Wine for XSI.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
>>> unsubscribe xsi
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
>> unsubscribe xsi
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Call friends with PC-to-PC calling -- FREE
> http://get.live.com/messenger/overview
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
