Actually I installed only the drivers. I didn't needed to do a full re-install.
By the way if you could the link of the forum, maybe off the list
Harry Bardak
TD / Compositor.
Http://perso.wanadoo.fr/harry.bardak/
+33 6 76 63 35 54
+44 781 661 4147
----------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:17:45 +0200
> Subject: Re: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
> From: holgi(at)mark13.com
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
>
>
> Hi harry,
> I have read the mac forum and they warn to install the bootcamp 1.1
>
> Hope you haven´t
>
> Holger
>
>
> > Von: Holger Weiss <holgi(at)mark13.com>
> > Antworten an: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
> > Datum: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:42:54 +0200
> > An: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
> > Unterhaltung: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
> > Betreff: Re: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
> >
> > Hi harry ,
> > Thanks for the tip withthe new bootcamp 1.1 ( on the website is only the
> > older 1.02 version posted so will try .
> > Regards
> > Holger
> >
> >
> >
> >> Von: Harry Bardak <hb_xsimailinglist(at)hotmail.com>
> >> Antworten an: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
> >> Datum: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:15:58 +0200
> >> An: Holger Weiss <xsi(at)Softimage.COM>
> >> Betreff: RE: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
> >>
> >> actually there is an update for bootcamp.
> >> You have new apple drivers.
> >> The keyboard is fully working. they add a the right click too.
> >> the camera and the speaker is working now.
> >>
> >>
> >> Harry Bardak
> >> TD / Compositor.
> >>
> >> Http://perso.wanadoo.fr/harry.bardak/
> >> +33 6 76 63 35 54
> >> +44 781 661 4147
> >>
> >> ----------------------------------------
> >>> Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:45:02 +0200
> >>> Subject: Re: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
> >>> From: holgi(at)mark13.com
> >>> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> >>>
> >>> I use a macbookpro 2.16 ghz with xsi (under win xp sp2) and it runs all fine
> >>> ( sometimes you need to wait longer for your renderegion), the one thing i
> >>> was a little was the grapficcard (ati x1600) but all is fine ( do a lot of
> >>> setups and rigging , so i don´t know how simulations run ( will test it and
> >>> maybe give it a qote)
> >>> I like the macbook pro , thing is under xp you haven´t yet the camera and
> >>> micro (build in) :(
> >>> but hopefully when bootcamp will be there you can easily switch between the
> >>> systems
> >>> Another thing is it is faster in photoshop than my workstation amd dual
> >>> core 4600+
> >>> Maybe one thing to mention, cause of the keyboard ( i use remap ) to get
> >>> access to things like alt gr and other window specific stuff
> >>> So if somebody have questions about the macbook (pro) don´t hasitate
> >>>
> >>> Holger
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Von: Luc-Eric Rousseau <lucer(at)Softimage.COM>
> >>>> Antworten an: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
> >>>> Datum: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:25:47 -0400
> >>>> An: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
> >>>> Unterhaltung: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
> >>>> Betreff: RE: new laptop - Macbook Pro?
> >>>>
> >>>> The only reason why I know the answer to this is that I've read discussions
> >>>> on
> >>>> this subject, I'm not saying any of this is obvious...
> >>>>
> >>>> ...but it's not possible to run Linux binaries under OSX because of the
> >>>> binary
> >>>> interface, which includes the work the linker does, the functions,
> >>>> libraries,
> >>>> and the format of the executables. OS X only supports its own binary
> >>>> format
> >>>> ("Mach-0") for executable, and Apple doesn't have the linux "emulation"
> >>>> that
> >>>> is, as you mention, in many other BSD variation to make the linux
> >>>> executable
> >>>> thinks it's running a normal linux.
> >>>>
> >>>> btw, OS X has a significantly modified BSD, with they have their own
> >>>> versions
> >>>> of gcc and file system locations, which probably complicates the matter.
> >>>>
> >>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>> From: Alan Jones
> >>>>>
> >>>>> OS X is based on a BSD if I recall. A few of the BSDs have support for
> >>>>> running linux binaries. I believe it's a kernel component and seeing
> >>>>> Apple have decided to make the kernel source available for the x86
> >>>>> architecture again I'd imagine that even if it's not in the standard
> >>>>> kernel it would be possible to port it relatively easily.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 8/28/06, Luc-Eric Rousseau <lucer(at)softimage.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> why would this be possible at all, OS X isn't based
> >>>>>> on linux. you'd have more chance running XSI Windows
> >>>>>> under Wine for XSI.
> >>>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> >>>> unsubscribe xsi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> >>> unsubscribe xsi
> >>
> >> _________________________________________________________________
> >> Call friends with PC-to-PC calling -- FREE
> >> http://get.live.com/messenger/overview
> >> ---
> >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> >> unsubscribe xsi
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> > unsubscribe xsi
>
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
_________________________________________________________________
Call friends with PC-to-PC calling -- FREE
http://get.live.com/messenger/overview
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
