RE: OGL playback, comparative benchmarks

Date : Sat, 2 Sep 2006 07:59:52 +0100
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "kim aldis" <kim(at)aldis.org.uk>
Subject : RE: OGL playback, comparative benchmarks
Yes, that would probably be a contributing factor. I've probably got some
scenes here with less texture. I'll test these and see what kind of
difference they make.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
> Behalf Of Luc-Eric Rousseau
> Sent: 01 September 2006 20:21
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: RE: OGL playback, comparative benchmarks
> 
> I missed important details in your original mail, the specialsituation
> here seems to be the large amount of texture, which Dom here believe do
> not fit all in the graphics care memory.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kim aldis
> >


---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.