-gc
On 10/17/06, Andre DeAngelis <andre.deangelis(at)ubisoft.com> wrote:
>
> We were able to produce jiggling lips quite easily with Face Robot.
>
>
>
> I think what most impressive is the preservation of volume of the lips.
>
>
>
> AD
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] *On
> Behalf Of *Sam Cuttriss
> *Sent:* October 17, 2006 12:31 PM
> *To:* XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> *Subject:* Re: face robot seems a bit outdone
>
>
>
> surely face robot would work in conjunction with that capturing system?
> (assuming a bottomless budget)
> I doubt they have it set up to efficiently manipulate captured animation,
> which is an area face robot distinguishes itself?
>
> one thing that was interesting was it appeared to capture the jiggle of
> that guys lips when he shook quickly.
> very nice indeed.
>
> _sam
>
> *SAM CUTTRISS**
> **3D AFICIONADO*
>
>
>
>
>
> Greg Smith wrote:
>
> wonder if there using some sort of Optical Flow algorithm to capture all
>
> of the subtleties of the actor's performance. This reminds me of
>
> Disney's Gemini Man project. From what I recall at a Siggy a few years
>
> back. They used optical flow to capture the performance of actors, and I
>
> remember them stating that it worked with better fidelity with a face
>
> unobscured by markers. I'm definitely interested in hearing more about
>
> this.
>
>
>
> my 2 cents,
>
> Greg
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 11:20 +0100, adrian wrote:
>
>
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2006/10/15/movies/15waxm.html?
>
> _r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
>
> check out the vid
>
>
>
> Adrian Wyer
>
> Fluid Pictures
>
> 33 Glasshouse Street
>
> London
>
> W1B 5DG
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
>
> unsubscribe xsi
>
>
>
>
>
>
------=_Part_76405_18692925.1161108514966
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
