I don't know about the python side, but Qt is my pick of wxWidgets as
far as the C++ side of the framework goes - I'd imagine a lot of the
API is similar.
Qt's GPL, though I don't know about PyQt, you can develop an
application for yourself/internal use with a GPL library and still be
within the license without giving the source code away - though you
have to not distribute it, but I'd imagine you're not going to be
anyway so it's probably a non-issue.
Cheers,
Alan.
On 11/14/06, Aloys Baillet <aloys.baillet(at)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't have a general opinion, but it works fine here!
Aloys
On 11/14/06, Kim Aldis <XSI(at)kim-aldis.co.uk > wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
> > Behalf Of Patrick Boucher
> > Sent: 14 November 2006 04:55
> > To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> > Subject: Re: Python: PyQt, wxpython, or Tkinter?
> >
> > it is a pain that Riverbank have taken the Python 2.4 version of the
> > bindings from their web site. If that is an issue for you, I have the
> > bindings for Python 2.4 and Qt 4.1.4.
> >
> Is there a general opinion on 2.5 yet?
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
--
Aloys Baillet - XSI Technical Director
Character Dpt - Animal Logic
--
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
