AW: XSI Berlin Usergroup closed down.

Date : Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:37:26 +0100
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Potthoff Marc" <Marc.Potthoff(at)P7S1Produktion.de>
Subject : AW: XSI Berlin Usergroup closed down.
Is it that time of the month or what went wrong????? 

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] 
> Im Auftrag von Thomas Helzle
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2006 19:24
> An: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Betreff: Re: XSI Berlin Usergroup closed down.
> 
> Luc, no fear, I will unsubscribe from this list now and no 
> longer bother anyone with my smallish concerns.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Thomas Helzle
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 18:09:03 +0100, Luc-Eric Rousseau 
> <lucer(at)Softimage.COM> wrote:
> 
> > This mailing list is going to hundreds of professionals 
> around the world and it
> > is for peer support between professionals using XSI.  It 
> would be best if it weren't
> > used for demands for attention, demands for official 
> responses, daily fits.
> > This tools is needed to communicate with artists about 
> their workflow
> > and production issues, this is what this tool was created 
> for.   There are other
> > avenues to reach support and sales.  If you don't get 
> answers there, it's
> > probably because there are many other users, all around the 
> world who also
> > have questions and issues.
> >
> > I think you violated your XSI 5.0 Foundation license 
> agreement by installing it on multiple machines,
> > and now you're upset that 6.0 actually enforces this as a 
> side effect of introducing unified SPM
> > licensing, which is more convenient for studios, delivering 
> QFEs, etc.   Fine, people get it.  Point taken.
> > But I think no one can answer your grievance here. If 
> anyone can, I think they shouldn't be expected
> > to do so immediately during Christmas diner or during the 
> release rush. As far as I can tell the one
> > license per machine policy was published as far back as the 
> Foundation 4.2 FAQ and has not
> > changed.
> >
> > Softimage is not a consumer product, it's not designed and 
> sold that way, and
> > Foundation comes with strings attached.  That's just the 
> way it is; XSI is an expensive
> > professional program and Foundation is grossly underpriced 
> for what it is.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM on behalf of Thomas Helzle
> > Posted At: Wed 12/27/2006 9:57 AM
> > To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> > Posted To: xsi
> > Subject: XSI Berlin Usergroup closed down.
> >Dear XSI Berlin Users:
> >
> > I just deleted the mailinglist and the content of the 
> xsi-berlin.org homepage.
> > I am no longer available to organize or promote any events 
> regarding XSI.
> >
> > Feel free to take over and create your own meetings.
> >
> > I am very sorry since I had a lot of fun with some of you 
> guys, but I am finally pissed off enough with Softimage to let it go.
> >
> > Carpe Diem,
> >
> > Thomas Helzle
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Thomas Helzle
> www.screendream.de
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following 
> text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
> 

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.