RE: XSI Berlin Usergroup closed down.

Date : Thu, 28 Dec 2006 10:52:30 -0000
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Andy Nicholas" <andy(at)andynicholas.com>
Subject : RE: XSI Berlin Usergroup closed down.
Dude, that's tragic. I'm gutted that you've decided to walk away from XSI.
We've just lost a major developer talent and significant contributor to the
XSI community.

Who's gonna champion the Messiah method of implementing the rendertree now?
;-)

All the best

Andy



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of
Thomas Helzle
Sent: 27 December 2006 18:24
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: XSI Berlin Usergroup closed down.

Luc, no fear, I will unsubscribe from this list now and no longer bother
anyone with my smallish concerns.

Cheers,

Thomas Helzle



On Wed, 27 Dec 2006 18:09:03 +0100, Luc-Eric Rousseau <lucer(at)Softimage.COM>
wrote:

> This mailing list is going to hundreds of professionals around the 
> world and it is for peer support between professionals using XSI.  It 
> would be best if it weren't used for demands for attention, demands for
official responses, daily fits.
> This tools is needed to communicate with artists about their workflow
> and production issues, this is what this tool was created for.   There are
other
> avenues to reach support and sales.  If you don't get answers there, 
> it's probably because there are many other users, all around the world 
> who also have questions and issues.
>
> I think you violated your XSI 5.0 Foundation license agreement by 
> installing it on multiple machines, and now you're upset that 6.0 actually
enforces this as a side effect of introducing unified SPM
> licensing, which is more convenient for studios, delivering QFEs, etc.
Fine, people get it.  Point taken.
> But I think no one can answer your grievance here. If anyone can, I 
> think they shouldn't be expected to do so immediately during Christmas 
> diner or during the release rush. As far as I can tell the one license 
> per machine policy was published as far back as the Foundation 4.2 FAQ and
has not changed.
>
> Softimage is not a consumer product, it's not designed and sold that 
> way, and Foundation comes with strings attached.  That's just the way 
> it is; XSI is an expensive professional program and Foundation is grossly
underpriced for what it is.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM on behalf of Thomas Helzle  Posted At: 
>Wed 12/27/2006 9:57 AM
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Posted To: xsi
> Subject: XSI Berlin Usergroup closed down.
>Dear XSI Berlin Users:
>
> I just deleted the mailinglist and the content of the xsi-berlin.org
homepage.
> I am no longer available to organize or promote any events regarding XSI.
>
> Feel free to take over and create your own meetings.
>
> I am very sorry since I had a lot of fun with some of you guys, but I am
finally pissed off enough with Softimage to let it go.
>
> Carpe Diem,
>
> Thomas Helzle
>
>



--
Thomas Helzle
www.screendream.de
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.