Re: It's a conspiracy!
| Date : Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10:14:06 -0000 |
| To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM> |
| From : "adrian" <adrian.wyer(at)fluid-pictures.com> |
| Subject : Re: It's a conspiracy! |
it's probably a link to a zip file on my old website, which is now gone, so i wouldn't blame Ed.....
glad you consider it worth keeping!
a
Adrian Wyer
Fluid Pictures
33 Glasshouse Street
London
W1B 5DG
T: +44 (0) 207 434 5133
www.fluid-pictures.com
----- Original Message ----- From: "Kim Aldis" <XSI(at)kim-aldis.co.uk>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:10 AM
Subject: RE: It's a conspiracy!
It would. But I also think, as well as good search engine, which it definitely needs, that there are issues with documentation and description of the tools that are on there. If you browse through the list it's sometimes difficult to tell what a tool does by its name and often the description is either not good or not there at all. The library needs moderating. It's not enough that it's just there.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Francois Lord Sent: 16 January 2007 21:01 To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM Subject: Re: It's a conspiracy!
I agree. XSInet would be the best place to put all the tools people write if we could easily search in there. Being able to submit a tool under many categories at once (like the articles on xsi-blog.com) and a good search engine that can search the content of the help files within the addons would make it rock!
Graham D Clark wrote: > I think xsi_net needs an overhaul. > I honestly prefered the old one, more categories and did not mirror > the xsi ui modules as much, but the old net was WAY more > reponsive/faster and easier to find stuff. > It was fun to share on the old one, but the new one has stuff in the > wrong categories, with no cross relations so impossible to finds o its > not ass worth posting as peopl never find your tools anyway and end up > emailing you directly. > Sorry I know the guys put some real effort into making xsi_net better > but IMHO its not good yet... > > Hey Kris I kept lots of the stuff until about a year ago too, I'll > look when I get back from the police station for that tool for you, I > very likely have it. > > ----------------------- > Graham D Clark (avail feb) > http://www.grahamdclark.com > http://www.linkedin.com/in/grahamclark > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/grahamclark> > http://www.xsibase.com/articles.php?detail=117 > > > On 1/16/07, *Kris Rivel* <krisrivel(at)gmail.com > <mailto:krisrivel(at)gmail.com>> wrote: > > Yeah, its frustrating for sure. I've tried to keep a massive > library of > just about every script, shader or addon ever posted. The > xsi_loscope > unfortunately I no longer have...must have not backed that one > up. What > I find particularly annoying is that you have four major sources for > these tools: XSI net, XSI Base, user/studio websites and this list > server. Problem is that you often find one thing on one site that you > won't find anywhere else. I thought the purpose of the XSI net was to > have all the tools the community put of for grabs available at one > place. I guess its tough to enforce it and make everyone put any tool > they make public on one site but it sure would make things > easier. One > of these days, I'll try to post all my tools I've collected over the > years on my website, many of which can no longer be found on the web. > > Kris > > Eric Lampi wrote: > > I swear, every tool, shader etc, I try to get from XSIbase and > EdHarriss.com is a dead link... Hmmm... I am not paranoid, > everyone really could be out to get me. Maybe I just have bad > 'net karma. > > > > Just kidding. > > > > Anyone have xsi_loscope kicking around on a drive? > > > > I just got a new laptop, so I am trying to keep a copy of all of > the nice toys you kind people write. This morning I came upon > something I could use it for. Thanks in advance. > > > > E > > > > Freelance 3-D Animator, F/X Artist > > > > --- > > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM > <mailto:Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM> with the following text in body: > > unsubscribe xsi > > > > > > --- > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM > <mailto:Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM> with the following text in body: > unsubscribe xsi > --- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: It's a conspiracy!
- From: "Simon Pickard" <mail(at)simonpickard.co.uk>
- Re: It's a conspiracy!
- References:
- It's a conspiracy!
- From: Eric Lampi <ericlampi(at)yahoo.com>
- Re: It's a conspiracy!
- From: Kris Rivel <krisrivel(at)gmail.com>
- Re: It's a conspiracy!
- From: "Graham D Clark" <mailgrahamdclark(at)gmail.com>
- Re: It's a conspiracy!
- From: Francois Lord <francoislord(at)gmail.com>
- RE: It's a conspiracy!
- From: "Kim Aldis" <XSI(at)kim-aldis.co.uk>
- It's a conspiracy!
| DATE: | << | >> | THREAD: | << | >> | INDEX: | Main | Thread |
|---|
- Previous by Date: RE: Python Com and Overloaded methods problem
- Next by Date: RE: Python Com and Overloaded methods problem
- Previous by Thread: RE: Python Com and Overloaded methods problem
- Next by Thread: RE: Python Com and Overloaded methods problem
- Index(es):
| Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available. |