Re: Maya's Nucleus! Looking yummi!
| Date : Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:05:38 +1030 |
| To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM |
| From : Raffaele Fragapane <jaco(at)thejaco.com> |
| Subject : Re: Maya's Nucleus! Looking yummi! |
Unified dynamics system IS NOT vague nor a catchphrase.
Unified dynamics system means that different kind of simulations can interact with each other. Particles deforming cloth, rigid bodies affected by particles, rigid bodies affecting softbodies, and a number of other things that maya was partially doing already, and that nucleus seems to be doing more extensively.
Whether it will be good or not or if it will be on par with Houdini in terms of usability we don't know yet, but even sadder then people falling for this, is seeing people discounting everybody "falling for this" like if he's an idiot that has no understanding whatsoever of the principles of mechanics and design of simulation systems.
Unified dynamic system = several systems designed to have a consistant interface, able to interact with each other, and operated through widgets and parameters that will operate sensibly across the board, possibly relating to values that don't go out of the scale of what can be dysplayed in the GUI.
Sure, there is marketing hype plastered all over it, but it's not just that.
Giving stuff fancy names like "metanurbs" or even "gator" or "motor" is name empowering marketing, and it's fine, but lets not play double standards if a company nobody likes uses in a fitting way something that's been called that way for a long time. What's next otherwise? Arguing whether something can be called fluid only if it's particles based or voxel based?
I'm starting to get a bit concerned by the number of anti positions, and respective favorable positions, I see emerging everyday. I'd be happier to see people in charge of fundamental design decisions to be a lil bit more open-minded and curious then this, or at least not discounting everything that's not in their field of likes as marketing idiocy.
****************************** | Raffaele Fragapane | | Rising Sun Pictures | |"The only way, is all the way"| ******************************
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] *On Behalf Of *Luc-Eric Rousseau *Sent:* February 26, 2007 12:51 PM *To:* XSI(at)Softimage.COM *Subject:* RE: Maya's Nucleus! Looking yummi!
That's pretty much the message that Autodesk marketing want to burn into your brain; the idea that there is something magical called 'nucleus' and that somehow any other solution is inconceivable and cannot work as well. I'm sorry to read that people are so easily falling for this. It looks like the phrase 'unified dynamics system' is vague enough that people will make it to mean anything they fantasize about, but it's really just that: a catch phrase, a dream catcher.
-----Original Message----- From: Sam Cuttriss
problem is "Gerard at Syflex" isnt in a position to do this. a unified dynamics system isnt going to result from a plugin developers work, it will require far greater integration into the core of xsi. as it stands syflex is a great system, but its integration is tenuous at best. i cant recall the last time i typed 0.00001 as a reasonable value for anything in xsi, it doesnt even recognize default xsi forces.
i dont think its wise to rely to heavily on a plugin developer for such fundimental functionality. by fundamental functionality, i mean a unified dynamics system; syflex has served it purpose as a standalone cloth sim well.
_sam
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discover the new Windows Vista Learn more! <http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=windows+vista&mkt=en-US&form=QBRE>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.17.29/673 - Release Date: 2/6/2007
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
- References:
- RE: Maya's Nucleus! Looking yummi!
- From: jim bough <jimbough(at)hotmail.com>
- RE: Maya's Nucleus! Looking yummi!
| DATE: | << | >> | THREAD: | << | >> | INDEX: | Main | Thread |
|---|
- Previous by Date: Re: Shading hair
- Next by Date: Re: Shading hair
- Previous by Thread: Re: Shading hair
- Next by Thread: Re: Shading hair
- Index(es):
| Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available. |