|
Or get you stuck in really interesting dead ends...
On 2/28/07, Stefan Andersson <sanders3d(at)gmail.com> wrote:
half finished tools gets you further than none-existing tools :)
/stefan
On 2/28/07, jordibares <jordibares(at)the-mill.com> wrote:
>
> Don't worry, they will half finished, abandon the idea, let the community
> add 100 scripts full of bugs and jump onto something else.
>
> Alias style I mean.
>
> jb
>
>
>
> On 26/2/07 17:50, "Luc-Eric Rousseau" <lucer(at)Softimage.COM> wrote:
>
>
> That's pretty much the message that Autodesk marketing
> want to burn into your brain; the idea that there
> is something magical called 'nucleus' and that somehow
> any other solution is inconceivable and cannot work
> as well. I'm sorry to read that people are so easily
> falling for this. It looks like the phrase 'unified dynamics
> system' is vague enough that people will make it to mean
> anything they fantasize about, but it's really just that:
> a catch phrase, a dream catcher.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sam Cuttriss
>
> problem is "Gerard at Syflex" isnt in a position to do this.
> a unified dynamics system isnt going to result from a plugin developers
> work, it will require far greater integration into the core of xsi.
> as it stands syflex is a great system, but its integration is tenuous at
> best.
> i cant recall the last time i typed 0.00001
as a reasonable value for
> anything in xsi, it doesnt even recognize default xsi forces.
>
> i dont think its wise to rely to heavily on a plugin developer for such
> fundimental functionality.
> by fundamental functionality, i mean a unified dynamics system; syflex
> has served it purpose as a standalone cloth sim well.
>
> _sam
>
>
>
--
__________________________________________
Pixel Abuser (at) http://www.swiss.se/
Blog: http://sanders3d.blogspot.com/
---
Unsubscribe? Mail
Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
--
Meng Yang Lu
Rigging/FX TD
Sony Cinematic Solutions Group
|
