Title: Re: Maya's Nucleus! Looking yummi!
All the comments I've heard (including people who have been
on board since the alpha) have been negative.
From: jordibares
[mailto:jordibares(at)the-mill.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007
4:24 AM
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Subject: Re: Maya's
Nucleus! Looking yummi!
Don’t worry, they will half finished, abandon the
idea, let the community add 100 scripts full of bugs and jump onto something
else.
Alias style I mean.
jb
On 26/2/07 17:50,
"Luc-Eric Rousseau" <lucer(at)Softimage.COM> wrote:
That's pretty much the message that Autodesk
marketing
want to burn into your brain; the idea that there
is
something magical called 'nucleus' and that somehow
any other solution is
inconceivable and cannot work
as well. I'm sorry to read that
people are so easily
falling for this. It looks like the phrase
'unified dynamics
system' is vague enough that people will make it to
mean
anything they fantasize about, but it's really just that:
a catch
phrase, a dream catcher.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sam
Cuttriss
problem is "Gerard at Syflex" isnt in a position to do
this.
a unified dynamics system isnt going to result from a plugin
developers
work, it will require far greater integration into the core of
xsi.
as it stands syflex is a great system, but its integration is
tenuous at
best.
i cant recall the last time i typed 0.00001 as a
reasonable value for
anything in xsi, it doesnt even recognize default
xsi forces.
i dont think its wise to rely to heavily on a plugin
developer for such
fundimental functionality.
by fundamental
functionality, i mean a unified dynamics system; syflex
has served it
purpose as a standalone cloth sim
well.
_sam
