RE: 64 vs. 32 bit with map files?

Date : Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:39:08 -0400
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Luc-Eric Rousseau" <lucer(at)Softimage.COM>
Subject : RE: 64 vs. 32 bit with map files?
The goal of .map file to be memory-mapped
directly without transformation, so they are by their 
very nature architecture-specific.  They're whole 
benefit is that they are directly in the memory 
format.  If they were not, then they would not
have any benefits over normal file formats.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Jones
> 
> ouch - architecture specific image format - who was the 
> genius behind that idea?
> 
> On 3/27/07, Halfdan Ingvarsson <hingvars(at)softimage.com> wrote:
> > Yes. Map files are essentially a memory dump of the 
> internal image format that mental ray uses.
> >
> > mr will happily load them from other platforms but doesn't 
> make any guarantees about their usefulness in that case.

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.