You're right, it's way different. I can see how it might look better for
hair but for bird feathering it's lost that softness that works so well.
Looks awful. Oh well.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
> Behalf Of Francois Lord
> Sent: 25 April 2007 15:56
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: Re: hair appearance; 5.xx and 6.xx
>
> Yes, there is a difference.
> When taking our Bell Beavers inside 6.01, we noticed they looked better
> and they took less time to render. Also, rasterizer doesn't seem to be
> a
> very good alternative anymore. I haven't done many tests.
>
> Kim Aldis wrote:
> > Has anyone noticed differences in the rendering of hair between 5 and
> 6? I'm
> > seeing a huge difference in a scene from a while back and I'm trying
> to work
> > out if it's the scene or mental ray/xsi.
> >
> >
> >
> > www.kim-aldis.co.uk
> > kim(at)kim-aldis.co.uk
> > Gallery of Work
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> body:
> > unsubscribe xsi
> >
> >
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> body:
> unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
