Re: particle simulation and video cards
| Date : Tue, 1 May 2007 16:06:47 +0200 |
| To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM> |
| From : "Tim Leydecker" <BauerOink(at)gmx.de> |
| Subject : Re: particle simulation and video cards |
"Now I do give my machines a regular brush every few months."
I know it's not Friday, but otherwise.... ;-)
It happens I´ve too much time on my hands today, it´s a bank holiday
I´d have spent adding something to my showreel, unfortunately I ignored
the fact that all I´ve left at home is a pretty much naked barebone stripped
of anything more usefull than that plain old notepad...so, no fancy pictures.
The last resort furry glove massage, (sc)rubbing desperately doesn´t help it,
I´ll have to postpone it some more...until I´ve my gear back. Ah, Fr(y)idays...
But to get back from OT:
How about the display refreshrate set for the boxx machine?
When re-installing nVidia drivers, it´s usually set to "best", e.g. maybe you´re hammering your display with 80-100HZ, while your laptop is feed with 60Hz and a lower resolution?
At least with games this may well give a difference in performance, as well does AA, which I think the Quadro drivers have set to "on" often, meaning you´ll actually have at least double the pixelresolution processed for every frame.
Did you try to select the "softimage" or "xsi" preset in the nVidia quadro driver settings? Do you have AA set to "off" instead to "by application"? In case you run a TFT instead a CRT, you´ll most likely won´t have to check the refresh rate, it´ll be 60HZ but it´s still worth to check that you run in true color mode instead of (default on install?) 16bit mode, which could also confuse your boxx.
Cheers
tim
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Wuijster" <robw(at)condor.tv>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: particle simulation and video cards
"Now I do give my machines a regular brush every few months."
I know it's not Friday, but otherwise.... ;-)
cheers,
Rob Wuijster
Condor Digital www.condor.tv Willemsparkweg 80 1071HL Amsterdam
+31 (0) 20 6712600 (T) +31 (0) 20 6713766 (F)
Tim Leydecker wrote: One bugger I ran into some time ago, a fluffy ball of dust had brought the fan of my graphicscard to a halt, which resulted in the card speedstepping the GPU and therefore delivering a pretty disapointing performance.
A saber brush (size 5...) solved this problem.
Now I do give my machines a regular brush every few months.
Cheers
tim
----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Pickard" <mail(at)simonpickard.co.uk>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: particle simulation and video cards
This is really weird..
A few things I can think of..
1. In display settings what's the driver listed as on the Boxx? Almost sounds like it's using the default VGA driver for some reason.
2. Playback can sometimes be more to do with the cpu than the gfx card. On the Boxx could you try running xsi in a single thread just to see if that gives you anything different (Goto the xsi process in task man, right click and set affinity to use just 1 cpu).
3. Are you running multi monitors on the Boxx. If so try just using a single display.
4. If you say "Hello HAL" to your laptop does it reply with "Hello Dave"? ;)
Regards, Simon.
On 30/04/07, Todd Alan Peleg <todd(at)theholdingcell.com> wrote:
i think i said before.. just about 3 times faster on my laptop..
so.. say the 100 frame sequence playing all frames takes 6 seconds to
playback on the BOXX (not exaggerating).. it takes a bit over 2 to play back
on my laptop..
but.. i recently tried an install of the NVIDIA drivers.. by removing the
old one first .. then installing the new one...
i did it 3 times.. the oldest driver for the card.. the newest... and the
SOFTIMAGE recommended one..
none of them made one bit of difference (yes.. i also changed the driver to
the softimage XSI setting in the properties)
Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote:
Well it's very typical to loose proper hardware acceleration after re-installing Windows and not installing the vendor's driver on top.
also what kind of frame per second are you talking about when you say it's
much faster?
________________________________
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of
Todd Alan Peleg
Posted At: Monday, April 30, 2007 5:04 PM
Posted To: xsi
Conversation: particle simulation and video cards
Subject: Re: particle simulation and video cards
this one was checked and didn't help.. except making my laptop slower..
made no change on the BOXX
i was gonna ask the systems guy about Kris' option.. that sounds interesting.. any other ideas .. please.. keep sending them
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: particle simulation and video cards
- From: Todd Alan Peleg <todd(at)theholdingcell.com>
- Re: particle simulation and video cards
- References:
- Re: particle simulation and video cards
- From: "Simon Pickard" <mail(at)simonpickard.co.uk>
- Re: particle simulation and video cards
- From: "Tim Leydecker" <BauerOink(at)gmx.de>
- Re: particle simulation and video cards
- From: Rob Wuijster <robw(at)condor.tv>
- Re: particle simulation and video cards
| DATE: | << | >> | THREAD: | << | >> | INDEX: | Main | Thread |
|---|
- Previous by Date: Re: online assets and resources, was Re: Framestore jobs?
- Next by Date: Re: online assets and resources, was Re: Framestore jobs?
- Previous by Thread: Re: online assets and resources, was Re: Framestore jobs?
- Next by Thread: Re: online assets and resources, was Re: Framestore jobs?
- Index(es):
| Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available. |