I don't think it would regulate an asset store, but it could be used to
give an indication of the quality of a particular asset, and quality
could include all the factors you listed, Kim.
There's a lot of good examples of online 'reputation' based systems -
Slashdot being one of them. I could imagine filtering Netview to only
show me plug-ins from people with a 'trust' or quality value I agreed
with.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kim Aldis [mailto:XSI(at)kim-aldis.co.uk]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 11:04 AM
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: RE: online assets and resources, was Re: Framestore jobs?
>
> I don't think so. Regulation is about more than just checking
> stuff is good.
> It's about making sure stuff is described correctly, well
> documented and that things like search keywords and naming
> are up to date and proper.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
> > Behalf Of Simon Pickard
> > Sent: 01 May 2007 15:54
> > To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> > Subject: Re: online assets and resources, was Re: Framestore jobs?
> >
> > "A 2nd problem is that the submissions to XSI Net are not regulated.
> > Who
> > determines which plugins/scripts/shaders are worthy of installation
> > onto a user's machine?"
> >
> > Wouldn't a ratings system kind of self regulate things those?
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following
> text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
