Re: slight OT: they want what we got!

Date : Tue, 1 May 2007 14:00:38 -0700
To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM
From : "Steven Caron" <carons(at)gmail.com>
Subject : Re: slight OT: they want what we got!
yea!

you can't expect it to always have the correct name. people do rename it. i remember matt lind pointing out to me it always being a specifc index. is this still the case in 6.x? i haven't been able to test it yet.

On 5/1/07, Francois Lord <francoislord(at)gmail.com> wrote:
Finding the Background partition can also prove to be tricky, especially
in 6.x.

Bernard Lebel wrote:
> I would add to that that having ways to determine if a partition is an
> object one or light one without looking up classids would be welcomed.
>
>
> Cheers
> Bernard
>
>
>
> On 5/1/07, Steven Caron <carons(at)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> also you
>> can't find partitions in the OM hierarchy list in the docs. probably
>> because
>> from what i can tell passes and partitions are both groups but
>> partitions
>> are only ever nested under passes. i am no engineer or programmer but it
>> seems to me partitions need to be their own class, under a group with
>> its
>> own members specific to partition functionality. or at least a
>> section to
>> explain this relationship.
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.