That's the thing, in 6.x it's not alway at the same index under
NestedObjects anymore. A real pain! I don't even know if it's still
possible to find them.
Steven Caron wrote:
yea!
you can't expect it to always have the correct name. people do rename
it. i remember matt lind pointing out to me it always being a specifc
index. is this still the case in 6.x? i haven't been able to test it yet.
On 5/1/07, *Francois Lord* <francoislord(at)gmail.com
<mailto:francoislord(at)gmail.com>> wrote:
Finding the Background partition can also prove to be tricky,
especially
in 6.x.
Bernard Lebel wrote:
> I would add to that that having ways to determine if a partition
is an
> object one or light one without looking up classids would be
welcomed.
>
>
> Cheers
> Bernard
>
>
>
> On 5/1/07, Steven Caron <carons(at)gmail.com
<mailto:carons(at)gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> also you
>> can't find partitions in the OM hierarchy list in the docs.
probably
>> because
>> from what i can tell passes and partitions are both groups but
>> partitions
>> are only ever nested under passes. i am no engineer or
programmer but it
>> seems to me partitions need to be their own class, under a
group with
>> its
>> own members specific to partition functionality. or at least a
>> section to
>> explain this relationship.
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM
<mailto:Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM> with the following text in
> body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM
<mailto:Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM> with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
