That's the thing, in 6.x it's not alway at the same index under
NestedObjects anymore. A real pain! I don't even know if it's still
possible to find them.
Steven Caron wrote:
> yea!
>
> you can't expect it to always have the correct name. people do rename
> it. i remember matt lind pointing out to me it always being a specifc
> index. is this still the case in 6.x? i haven't been able to test it yet.
>
> On 5/1/07, *Francois Lord* <francoislord(at)gmail.com
> <mailto:francoislord(at)gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Finding the Background partition can also prove to be tricky,
> especially
> in 6.x.
>
> Bernard Lebel wrote:
> > I would add to that that having ways to determine if a partition
> is an
> > object one or light one without looking up classids would be
> welcomed.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > Bernard
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/1/07, Steven Caron <carons(at)gmail.com
> <mailto:carons(at)gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> also you
> >> can't find partitions in the OM hierarchy list in the docs.
> probably
> >> because
> >> from what i can tell passes and partitions are both groups but
> >> partitions
> >> are only ever nested under passes. i am no engineer or
> programmer but it
> >> seems to me partitions need to be their own class, under a
> group with
> >> its
> >> own members specific to partition functionality. or at least a
> >> section to
> >> explain this relationship.
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM
> <mailto:Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM> with the following text in
> > body:
> > unsubscribe xsi
> >
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM
> <mailto:Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM> with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
