I just got a Quadro 4600 and I'm very happy with. Absolutely screams.
From what I understand, the 4600 is faster than the 5500 as well. 5500
has more memory though. The new 5600 is supposed to be king of the
hill....very expensive though.
Kris
Antonin Messier-Turcotte wrote:
Just as a side question, you say the quadro is 3 times as fast, but
are the peformances of the 8800 gtx still acceptable? I'm thinking
about getting one of those...
Thanks!
Antonin
Morten Bartholdy wrote:
I just tested a GeForce 8800 GTX vs. a Quadro 4600 on the same
machine today. These cards are supposedly based on the same gpu and
have the same amount of texture memory - 768 MB RAM. I used the
latest GeForce standard driver and the correct Quadro set to XSI ogl,
and found a baffling performance difference in favour of the Quadro!!
It was 2-3 times as fast as the GeForce in most tests - wireframe,
hidden line, depth cue, shaded and textured. I made a test with about
3000 objects and 1,6 million triangles and one with one object and
the same triangle amount - a merged version af the first scene.
Actually the Quadro was relative faster at handling the scene with
many objects thna the merged one. I am guessing it might be possible
to find a better OGL setting for the GeForce driver and perhaps
increase the performance some, but still, the difference is remarkable.
I wonder if someone here has had a chance to make more thorough
camparisons between GeForce and Quadro hardware twins, and can offer
some insight? I am really beginning to wonder if the Quadro isn't
worth the extra pricetag - actually it makes sense - it is 2-3 times
faster and cost about 3 times as much as the GeForce.
Best regards
Morten Bartholdy
3D & VFX Artist
----- Original Message ----- From: "Todd Alan Peleg"
<todd(at)theholdingcell.com>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: hardware - which card is certified?
i have a bad experience with 2 fx3500's and the fx3000's
there are 2 of them here at the place i am at and the performance of
them has been whipped by my 5 year old laptop's nvidia
(i have yet to explain it)
some other people have offered MANY options to fix what seems to be
for no reason.. i haven't had time to investigate it.. but.. for it
to be the case in multiple machines... i doubt its a rare thing..
for what its worth
todd
Jeff McFall wrote:
Trying to pick cards for new machines and we are looking for some
clarification regarding the QuadroFx3500.
On the Softimage support site the QuadroFx3500 is not listed as
"certified"
http://www.softimage.com/support/xsi/certified_graphics_cards/xp32/default.aspx
However on the workstation page
http://www.softimage.com/support/xsi/certified_workstations/default.aspx
The 3500 is listed as certified (at least for 5.11) in a Dell 690
and Dell 490
Trying to get some solid info as to why this is.
Is this just an oversight or something that should be considered
given changes in XSI 6. ?
Also curious if there are any major performance differences between
the two cards.
From the specs it appears the 3500 may be more adept at handling
textures.
Any other points to consider if we went with the lesser card?
Thanks for any feedback or suggestions
Jeff
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text
in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
