The flare is a property of the camera's lens setup and the motion blur is a property of the shutter speed + film/ccd.
So, yes. Strictly speaking the flare should be blurred.
- ½
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Chris Marshall
Sent: 21-May-2007 07:17
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: MB lens flare
Unfortunately Kim, I *was* thinking about it! :(
Kim Aldis wrote:
> If you think about it, it makes sense.
>
> Strictly speaking, DOF probably would affect flares in that the
> pattern would change. They wouldn't go out of focus though.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
>> Behalf Of Chris Marshall
>> Sent: 21 May 2007 10:42
>> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
>> Subject: Re: MB lens flare
>>
>> That's interesting. I would never have thought that a lens flare
>> would blur.
>>
>>
>> Robert Martinu wrote:
>>
>>> Chris Marshall wrote:
>>>
>>>> Should the flare actually be blurred?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> If the flaring lightsource moves, then the flares location does the
>>> same and should be blurred.
>>> Its the DOF that doesn't effect lens flares.
>>>
>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
