Which type I use would depend on what kind of
material I am compressing, but I usually use Mpeg4 Video for my work and it
provides good quality and reasonable filesizes. I think 264 is superior to that
but I have had trouble encoding with 264, so I went back to mpeg4. I always use
full quality and fiddle with data rate until I get either the filesize I need
for mailing or ftp or a good balance between size and quality required for
reasonable viewing.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 1:06
PM
Subject: OTish - Best Quicktime format
for previews
Hello
all,
So, who uses what
QT format for the best results? What's the flavour of the
month?
Recently we've had
some people saying Motion JPEG-A is the way to go & others saying "OH no,
don't do dat!".
We used to be
happy with Sorenson3 'till Motion JPEG-A was brought up.
Or is it H.261,
263 or 264 that gives the best result?
There are bound to
be sliding scales but what good balances have been found for colour accuracy
& size.
Cheers,
Adam.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG
Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.9 - Release Date:
04/06/2007 00:00
