Wouldn't it be possible to add the samples cluster and hotplug them to the
same operator that is unwrapping. With portgroups you can add unlimited
inputs after your operator was created. But i'm just a low level scripter,
so I can be completly wrong.
Anyway thanks again for sharing!
Ahmidou.
2007/6/1, Alan Jones <skyphyr(at)gmail.com>:
> I'm not sure on the pinned stuff - it would be very useful, but the
> XSI operator model doesn't lend itself very well to it.
>
> In order for it to function you'd need to create a set of UVs with it
> (unpinned). Then use that set of UVs and create a cluster of samples.
> From there you'd apply a second operator which takes the mesh, and the
> UVs and the pinning cluster and recalculates it.
>
> You'd need to mute your second operator, shift your pinned points,
> then unmute the operator. Otherwise XSI will just apply moves to your
> points after the new UVs. i.e. there's no neat way for cycling stuff
> where it's possible in XSI.
>
> Perhaps a very intelligent dev somewhere could come up with a
> suggestion for a better way of implementing it?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Alan.
>
> On 6/1/07, Ahmidou Lyazidi <ahmidou.xsi(at)gmail.com> wrote:
> > That's cool! Thank you very much. Just to know is it planed to add the
pin
> > stuff?
> > Thanks again
> > Ahmidou.
> >
> > 2007/6/1, Alan Jones <skyphyr(at)gmail.com >:
> > > Didn't I tell you all Halfy's great?
> > > http://www.binaryiris.com/xsi/dungarees.tar.bz2
> > >
> > > Also anyone at Soft happen to log that bug with unfrozen meshes and
> > > GetClusterPropertyBuilder() or should I go fill it in?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Alan.
> > >
> > > On 6/1/07, Alan Jones < skyphyr(at)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Not that I've been let know of yet, Ahmidou. It seems you can't even
> > > > give windows users a gift unless you install it and click the
buttons
> > > > for them ;-)
> > > >
> > > > We're loving here at Fluid though, Halfy - so another big thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > >
> > > > Alan.
> > > >
> > > > On 6/1/07, Ahmidou Lyazidi < ahmidou.xsi(at)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > Did someone had some success to compile it for windows?
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > A.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2007/5/31, Philipp Oeser < philipp.oeser(at)liga01.de>:
> > > > > > Ah, nice info!
> > > > > > opens up a whole new range of possibilities...
> > > > > > [note to myself: - (1) plant a tree! (2) build a house! (3) wrap
> > > > > > blender's magic fluid control! :) ]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanx again for the effort, halfdan/alan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Philipp
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Alan Jones schrieb:
> > > > > > > I think it was also to do with dynamic vs static linking.
Because
> > it's
> > > > > > > distributed in an unlinked form the user is linking it at
runtime.
> > > > > > > This means the linking is part of use, not distribution - at
least
> > > > > > > that's the impression further research gave.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Alan.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 5/30/07, Halfdan Ingvarsson < hingvars(at)softimage.com >
wrote:
> > > > > > >> This is based on confusion around the GPL "linking clause"
which
> > > > > > >> applies to works that "derive" from GPL-ed software (ie. the
> > > > > > >> "derived" software cannot work without linking to a GPL-ed
> > software).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The linking clause does not apply in this case since XSI
doesn't
> > > > > > >> require the plugin in order to run. So XSI is not a
derivative
> > work
> > > > > > >> of the plugin in that sense.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> This is an important distinction, because otherwise you
wouldn't
> > be
> > > > > > >> able to run opensource apps on windows, since they require
> > windows in
> > > > > > >> order to work.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> The LGPL removes this requirement and is used for most, if
not
> > all,
> > > > > > >> system libraries on Linux, since closed source applications
> > require
> > > > > > >> them in order to run on Linux.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Alan's original impression was that it went both ways, which
is
> > not
> > > > > > >> the case
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> (I'm only using Linux here since it represents a mixed
GPL/LGPL
> > > > > > >> environment that closed source applications run on).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LIGA_01 COMPUTERFILM GmbH
> > > > > > Philipp Oeser
> > > > > >
> > > > > > MUNICH
> > > > > > Landwehrstrasse 60-62
> > > > > > 80336 Munich, Germany
> > > > > > fon: +49 - (0)89 - 51 555 8-88
> > > > > > fax: +49 - (0)89 - 51 555 8-77
> > > > > >
> > > > > > www.liga01.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Diese Nachricht enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich
geschützte
> > > > > Informationen. Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder
diese
> > > > > Nachricht irrtümlich erhalten haben, informieren Sie bitte den
> > Absender und
> > > > > löschen diese Nachricht. Das unerlaubte Kopieren und die unbefugte
> > > > > Weiterleitung dieser Nachricht sind nicht gestattet.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This message may contain confidential and/or privileged
information.
> > If
> > > > > you are not the intended recipient or if you have received this
> > message in
> > > > > error, please notify the sender and delete this message. Any
> > unauthorised
> > > > > copying, disclosure or distribution of this message is strictly
> > forbidden.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following
text in
> > body:
> > > > > > unsubscribe xsi
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
> > > unsubscribe xsi
> > >
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
