DATE:	<<	>>		THREAD:	<<	>>		INDEX:	Main	Thread

Re: FX tree nodes vs. render tree nodes

Date : Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:21:14 -0400

To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM

From : todd akita <takita(at)earthlink.net>

Subject : Re: FX tree nodes vs. render tree nodes

Kris Rivel wrote:

Sorry if this is digging into old wounds but can we get an official explanation as to why the FX tree is "still" so different from the render tree? There are so many differeneces:
1.  horizontal vs. vertical
2.  color vs. monochromatic
3.  nodes disappear on refresh vs. stay in place

Careful what you ask for, I'd REALLY rather not have dangling fxtree nodes disappear on refresh.

Of everything on your list I'd be happy just with having F2 to rename nodes. :)

-T
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FX tree nodes vs. render tree nodes
  - From: "Kris Rivel" <krisrivel(at)gmail.com>

References:
- FX tree nodes vs. render tree nodes
  - From: "Kris Rivel" <krisrivel(at)gmail.com>

DATE:	<<	>>		THREAD:	<<	>>		INDEX:	Main	Thread

Previous by Date: Syflex Pin Pops
Next by Date: Syflex Pin Pops
Previous by Thread: Syflex Pin Pops
Next by Thread: Syflex Pin Pops
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread

Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.