Re: FX tree nodes vs. render tree nodes

Date : Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:33:22 -0400
To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM
From : "Kris Rivel" <krisrivel(at)gmail.com>
Subject : Re: FX tree nodes vs. render tree nodes
Uh yeah...should of clarified that.  I'm just stating the differences but yes, we don't want nodes disappearing.  And yes, FX tree really should be able to rename with F2 as well.

Kris

On 7/18/07, todd akita <takita(at)earthlink.net> wrote:
Kris Rivel wrote:
> Sorry if this is digging into old wounds but can we get an official
> explanation as to why the FX tree is "still" so different from the
> render tree?  There are so many differeneces:
>
> 1.  horizontal vs. vertical
> 2.  color vs. monochromatic
> 3.  nodes disappear on refresh vs. stay in place
Careful what you ask for, I'd REALLY rather not have dangling fxtree
nodes disappear on refresh.

Of everything on  your list I'd be happy just with having F2 to rename
nodes.  :)

-T
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.