RE: OT XSI on Vista64// everything fine?

Date : Fri, 20 Jul 2007 10:44:14 -0400
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Luc-Eric Rousseau" <lucer(at)Softimage.COM>
Subject : RE: OT XSI on Vista64// everything fine?
Title: RE: OT XSI on Vista64// everything fine?

I don't use Vista, but the memory
usage thing is not supposed to be a problem,
it's the operating system that's using the memory
differently than XP.  It's using otherwise unused
memory for caches that will be immediately
released when an application needs it.


-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Leydecker

I´ve earned the golden Guinea pig status now.

The 25-30% CPU usage (on below Core2Quad 2,4GHz)
was most likely due to the Sidebar still active althought it´s
more or less useless with the "windows classic" design.

Deactivating that gives a pretty idle CPU, the memory
footprint is still at around 1 GB Ram. I´ve installed 64bit
XSI 6.02 for a testdrive, it starts and behave normally.

Yet, I´ve decided to downgrade my Vista64 business
license to a XP64 pro license. Mostly for the snappier
feel and less clutter XP64 imho has in direct comparison
when using a classic windows mode. It also just blocks
about 275 MB RAM in idle mode, I´ll prefer to use
the ~768 MB difference for yet another ZBrush level :-)

Cheers

tim

P.S: The bootup time of Vista64 is horrible on my PC
and my nerves, probably a user error not covered by UAC.
(I am very glad UAC had been no integral part of XP64...)




----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Leydecker" <BauerOink(at)gmx.de>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 2:20 AM
Subject: Re: OT XSI on Vista64// everything fine?


> Here´s my personal follow up on Vista64, mint install,
> prior to having XSI setup and running on a consumer
> level Core2Quad 2,4GHz, 8GB RAM, Nvidia 7900GT.
> (it´s rating 4.9, with the RAM performance poorest).
>
> First of all, it´s dogslow and a memory hog.
>
> I should have ordered XP64 instead of constantly
> wasting ~ one of my cores and 1-1.25 GB RAM for
> a more or less idle Vista desktop with UAC on top.
> (User Access Control, "You sure you wanna do this?")
>
> After configuring things back to Windows Classic look
> and sifting through all sorts of subsubsubsublevel options
> I am back to the XP/W2K look&feel exhausted...
>
> The frustrating thing is, the 1.25 footprint and 25-30%
> CPU usage with idle desktop is still there.
>
> I think I´ll buy an XP64 lic tommorrow.
>
> Cheers
>
> tim
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joe Laffey" <joe(at)laffey.tv>
> To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:22 PM
> Subject: Re: OT XSI on Vista64// everything fine?
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, Tim Leydecker wrote:
>
>> Doesn´t the default quicktime installer for windows xp/vista
>> work for you? I´m pretty sure I´ve watched *.mov files
>> encoded in H.264 on XP64 using the Quicktime Player.
>>
>> The apple/quicktime page just lists these requirements:
>>
>> ° Pentium processor-base PC or compatible computer
>> ° At least 128MB of RAM
>> ° Windows XP Service Pack 2 or Vista
>
>
>
> I must admit I never even tried installing Quicktime under XP64. I read
> everywhere that it did not work (and believed them...)
>
> Does it install and work for 32 bit apps?
>
> --
> Joe Laffey                |       Visual Effects for Film and Video
> LAFFEY Computer Imaging   |     -------------------------------------
> St. Louis, MO             |       Show Reel http://LAFFEY.tv/?e06223
> USA                       |     -------------------------------------
> .                         |        -*- Digital Fusion Plugins -*-
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mail here will be rejected --> "Real Trap" <r_trap(at)laffeycomputer.com>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi


---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.