Re: monitors?

["Alexander Hemery" <vortex(at)fhw.gr>]

I'm just teasing ...

 

but seriously, I think you will agree that they are superior as far as image quality and color reproduction is concerned. And that they would be 'correct' if properly calibrated for a medium .. TV/print etc.

 

I've even used that spider calibration thingy on two LG's I have at home and white still looks greenish-white....

Two Dell's I have at work show the middle gray, brownish...   and ofcourse ..both monitors in both occasions can't show the exact same colours even with the exact same settings.

 

...either that or i'm going color blind.

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Kim Aldis

To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM

Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 2:40 PM

Subject: RE: monitors?

So you?re telling me that it?s automagically correct for web, TV, DVD, CMYK, every printer ever made, all at the same time? Excellent. Is it right for film too?

 

From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Alexander Hemery
Sent: 02 August 2007 11:02
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: monitors?

 

Eizo r0x ..period :P

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Kim Aldis

To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM

Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 12:05 PM

Subject: RE: monitors?

 

 

That makes no sense. True for what?

 

From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Alexander Hemery
Sent: 02 August 2007 09:55
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: monitors?

 

If it's an eizo ...it's as true as it gets