DATE:	<<	>>		THREAD:	<<	>>		INDEX:	Main	Thread

RE: .TAG in After FX

Date : Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:30:20 +0100

To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>

From : "kim aldis" <xsi(at)kim-aldis.co.uk>

Subject : RE: .TAG in After FX

That's why no-one uses tag channels. They don't anti-alias. Using the new
channels in 6 you should be able to extract mattes just as easily. Look to
the Store In nodes in the render tree, under render channels.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
> Behalf Of Darren Macpherson
> Sent: 21 August 2007 22:09
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: Re: .TAG in After FX
> 
> Thanks Takita and Luc-Eric
> 
> but the problem is that it seems to remain aliased and does
> not line up with the other passes antialiasing.  


---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: .TAG in After FX
  - From: Darren Macpherson <darren.3d(at)gmail.com>

References:
- .TAG in After FX
  - From: Darren Macpherson <darren.3d(at)gmail.com>
- Re: .TAG in After FX
  - From: takita <takita(at)earthlink.net>
- RE: .TAG in After FX
  - From: "Luc-Eric Rousseau" <lucer(at)Softimage.COM>
- Re: .TAG in After FX
  - From: Darren Macpherson <darren.3d(at)gmail.com>

DATE:	<<	>>		THREAD:	<<	>>		INDEX:	Main	Thread

Previous by Date: RE: .TAG in After FX
Next by Date: RE: .TAG in After FX
Previous by Thread: RE: .TAG in After FX
Next by Thread: RE: .TAG in After FX
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread

Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.