Re: 6.x rendermanager

Date : Wed, 22 Aug 2007 17:08:06 +0200
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Morten Bartholdy" <xsi(at)colorshopvfx.dk>
Subject : Re: 6.x rendermanager
Actually Kim, I am frantically searching through all three PPG's and the Render Manager to try and make sure all passes render with the setings I want and wind up in each their output folder - the latter seems the most difficult now. This is of course because it is the first time I really use these PPG's i 6.x and I am in a big hurry because of looming deadlines. I am sure Kris is right I will get the hang of it and eventually appreciate the improved functionality but I still think there is some merit in having PPG's for stuff like this that I can grasp the second time I look at them, and in this implementation that is not the case.
 
I hear you Francois - it looks better prepared for several renderers than in pre 6.x but the UI is still a mess IMHO. Personally I would like all renderer options to be available in the same PPG popping up when a particular renderer is selected. Actually I found my self trying to edit the parameters in the Summary tab because of the good overview there.
 
- MB
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: kim aldis
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: 6.x rendermanager

Are you using the render manager?

 

From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Morten Bartholdy
Sent: 22 August 2007 14:28
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: 6.x rendermanager

 

I do understand the good parts Kim - I am sure the intentions and functionality are a big plus. My gripe is the spreading of global and pass specific parameters over 3-4 PPG's. I keep searching for where to set filter type or padding etc. - that sucks.

 

I have no idea what tokens you are talking about!?

 

- MB

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: kim aldis

Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2007 1:54 PM

Subject: RE: 6.x rendermanager

 

I?m going to jump in and disagree once more. Just to level the playfield. J

 

I?ve nothing but good to say about the way this works. I had to drop back to 5.11 on one job and the difference in the amount of time it took me to set up for rendering doesn?t even bear thinking about. I just love it.

 

Are you using the tokens for your output paths Morten? That?s a good place to start making life easier.

 

From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Morten Bartholdy
Sent: 22 August 2007 10:09
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: 6.x rendermanager

 

This is my first production with 6.0x rendering and I just have to get it off my chest - it just sucks how messy it is now! I can see the virtues of the global stuff but damn it is hard to make sure I render with a specific filename per pass, padding and specific output path >:/

 

I remember the long thread about this back when 6. was released and I guess I have to second those that said it was a serious UI regression!

 

Morten Bartholdy
3D & VFX Artist


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.