Well, standalone is needed as soon as you have mixed enviroment. Or
else you need to pay double for each node.
And don't get me started on the x64 pricing deal... apparently
developers (read: mental images) don't want us to use x64.
/stefan
On 10/1/07, takita <takita(at)earthlink.net> wrote:
> Well they USED to sell standalone mental ray licenses. Apparently there
> was a bit of a shift away from that mode of thought a few years back.
>
> Though hearsay suggests that there are these things in 3.6 called
> Assemblies (similar to Renderman's ReadArchive) which might make
> standalone rendering rather attractive when it comes to mixed-software
> pipelines.
>
> -T
>
> peter boeykens wrote:
> > a token for this and a token for that - a token for the os your using,
> > a token for working with GUI, a token for working without, a token for
> > batch rendering, a token for standalone rendering, a token for
> > universal batch rendering, a token for....
> > how much more complex can the licensing become?
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
--
__________________________________________
Pixel Abuser (at) http://www.swiss.se/
Blog (at) http://sanders3d.blogspot.com/
Web (at) http://sanders3d.googlepages.com/
work e.mail: stefan [at] swiss.se
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
