Perhaps this has changed in recent release so disregard if what I say
is incorrect, but I assume this is because the mi export is not
available as a standalone tool, and thus, requires a xsibatch-enabled
license at least to use it.
I fully agree that either a standalone export tool or the possibily to
run a -exportmi-ish kind of system command without the need to use a
license token would be really, really, really nice.
Cheers
Bernard
On Nov 23, 2007 6:55 AM, Stefan Andersson <sanders3d(at)gmail.com> wrote:
> Why should XSI users be punished with having to buy extra licenses
> just to be able to export MI files????? I'm not a very happy camper
> right now. The other side (maya/max) has free MI export, while we have
> to pay for it... which makes it even more wierd since up until
> recently the ONLY choice for us have been mental ray.
>
> So why do we have to pay for processing tokens?? Can anyone give me an
> answer that justify it, or is it just a policy so that you force
> companys to buy more licenses??
>
> The other side also has no extra fees if you would like to have a
> Linux version.... (die MainWin...die MainWin...)
>
>
> /stefan
>
>
>
> --
> __________________________________________
> Pixel Abuser (at) http://www.swiss.se/
> Blog (at) http://sanders3d.blogspot.com/
> Web (at) http://sanders3d.googlepages.com/
> work e.mail: stefan [at] swiss.se
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
