so, we all agree that is utterly important.
why didnt soft put it in yet?
why nobody wrote a script to do it? at least i cant see one.
is there something behind it that prevents a successful transfer?
ciao
franky
Friday, November 30, 2007, 10:05:34 AM, you wrote:
MB> You may have been there but if not, a workaround would be to make dummy
MB> objects that represent all the parameters and pieces - camera, interest etc.
MB> that you need transferred, including animation. They will transfer fine
MB> since it is srt and then you could redo the camera in XSI with those. Not
MB> quick nor elegant but it would work.
MB> And I second the notion that camera transfer is extremely important for IO
MB> tools like Crosswalk.
MB> Morten Bartholdy
MB> 3D & VFX Artist
MB> ----- Original Message -----
MB> From: "Rob Wuijster" <rob(at)glassworksamsterdam.nl>
MB> To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
MB> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 3:21 PM
MB> Subject: 3dsmax camera's to xsi, possible??
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Even with the new crosswalk v. 2.5 it's still not possible to export your
>> camera's from 3dsmax to xsi.
>>
>> I've searched the web, found some tools (motionblur.it) but they don't
>> work properly. I get the wrong FOV's, or the camera's are looking in the
>> wrong direction, no interests etc.
>>
>> Is there something out there that does work? I managed to get the scene in
>> with a combination of crosswalk and fbx for the geometry, but the camera's
>> won't come in properly, not even with fbx.
>>
>> --
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Rob Wuijster
>> Glassworks Amsterdam
>> ---
>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
>> unsubscribe xsi
>>
>>
MB> ---
MB> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
MB> unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
