Re: ambient lightsource

["guillaume laforge" <guillaume.laforge.3d(at)gmail.com>]

Sorry Thomas, but I w

On Dec 1, 2007 5:17 PM, Thomas Helzle <thomashelzle(at)gmail.com> wrote:

Ok, "the shadertree in XSI", but some of the quirks are based on how MR works or was originally developed.

For instance: not being able to mute a node (other than a just-flowing-through modifier) is based on any connected input "forgetting" about what was set in the interface. messiah on the other hand always allows to mix an input with the already existing value set in the receiving node or alpha it on top, so if you mute the external node, it just uses what was set in the receiving node. I implemented this in some of my own shaders by separating input from interface and have a mixing option for each parameter but it is quite a pain and far from optimal.

I guess conversion nodes being visible is Softimages idea which could be solved by something clever like in Lightwaves node editor where the connection has a gradient (for instance from green to red) to show what happens.

Not having multiple outputs per node is probably MR again? Although a node _can_ output an array and maybe XSI could unravel those in the gui?

Vanishing unconnected nodes could probably be kept by Softimage if they would be willing to spend the effort of saving the parameters of the unconnected nodes "somehow" on their own?

Easier said than done, I know. Therefore I do what I can myself ;-)

Cheers,

Thomas Helzle

On Dec 1, 2007 4:55 PM, guillaume laforge < guillaume.laforge.3d(at)gmail.com> wrote:

>I never was a friend of those cluttered node monsters MR makes so easy to build

Don't blame MR, it is not is fault ;-)

On Dec 1, 2007 3:52 PM, Thomas Helzle < thomashelzle(at)gmail.com> wrote:

Sure, I just prefer a clean Shadertree ;-) I never was a friend of those cluttered node monsters MR makes so easy to build ;-)  ("conversion nodes" shudder...)

But hey, that's just me :-)

Cheers,

Thomas Helzle

On Dec 1, 2007 3:45 PM, guillaume laforge < guillaume.laforge.3d(at)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Dec 1, 2007 3:31 PM, Thomas Helzle <thomashelzle(at)gmail.com> wrote:
>While you can build it in the tree as guillaume showed, that isn't exactly fun anymore after the third time, is it ;-) 

Save / Load preset ?

--
Guillaume Laforge

-- 
Guillaume Laforge