No, but I took the issue more to be the missing calculation of
inbetween frames for things which can't be evaluated arbitrarily at
any point in time rather than certainly of actual playback. Oops :D
Steven, what sort of calculations are you reusing? If it's something
changing that doesn't during playback you're worried about perhaps you
could look at caching the result based on a comparison of the driving
value and previous versions? Kinda like a dynamic lookup table.
Cheers,
Alan.
On Dec 13, 2007 2:25 PM, Raffaele Fragapane <jaco(at)thejaco.com> wrote:
> that wouldn't make a distinction between stepping and playback though.
>
> +--------------------------+
> | Raffaele Fragapane |
> | Gun For Hire |
> +--------------------------+
>
>
>
>
> Alan Jones wrote:
>
> >Hi Steven,
> >
> >How about you have the operator remember the last frame it was evaluated on?
> >
> >If it's one less than the current frame then they're playing back.
> >
> >Cheers,
> >
> >Alan.
> >
> >On Dec 13, 2007 3:11 AM, Steven Caron <carons(at)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>hey
> >>
> >>does anyone know if there is a good way to decide if the playback is active
> >>from within a scripted operator? i need to make some kinda distinction
> >>between someone just stepping/jumping through the timeline or playing back.
> >>
> >>thanks
> >>steven
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >---
> >Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> >unsubscribe xsi
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
