Re: Coming back from Maya

Date : Sun, 3 Feb 2008 14:51:51 -0800
To : "XSI(at)Softimage.COM" <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : Steven Caron <carons(at)gmail.com>
Subject : Re: Coming back from Maya
Well I am in defense of the interaction model gene was suggesting to be removed entirely.


On Feb 3, 2008, at 8:35 AM, "kim aldis" <xsi(at)kim-aldis.co.uk> wrote:

Why do people get so fuelled up about the way others work when it makes not a jot of difference to them or their lives? Honestly, Iâm intrigued.

 

From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Thomas Helzle
Sent: 03 February 2008 12:15
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: Coming back from Maya

 

Gene: So basically what you are saying is: Your "opinion" is right because those who prefer the XSI interaction have no "hard facts for theirs?
99.998% of what humans are doing and believing is "opinion based" - so what? ;-)

Cheers,

Thomas

On Feb 2, 2008 7:31 PM, Gene Crucean <emailgeneonthelist(at)gmail.com> wrote:

Opinion based. I feel perfectly fine.

 


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.