From: Raffaele
Fragapane
I don't know how it keeps
happening, or if somebody is making a conscious effort not to read the
sense in what's being written, but nobody seems to want
full operators connections in the schematic, don't know where you read
that Luc.
From the post I quoted in my reply:
From: Bradley
Gabe
[…] As far as improvements go,
it also seems there are two areas, aesthetic improvements such as node size and
layout, and functionality improvements such as the
ability to rewire operator connections.
And there were a couple of posts referring to Houdini, and Hyper
Graph, which is the view on Maya DAG, and not merely just a relation viewer.
Yeah, please no more views,
please!
The proposed added functions would NOT change the schematic one bit, just make
it more useful.
I don't know how it keeps happening, or if somebody is making a conscious
effort not to read the sense in what's being written, but nobody seems to want
full operators connections in the schematic, don't know where you read that
Luc.
All people have been asking for is better layout tools/options and possibly
some sort of access to it. That doesn't change the "schematic
experience"tm one flying iota for anybody who uses it in its current form,
it enhanches it for them as well if anything.
If we could also reconnect constraints that would be a bonus, and that also
would NOT change the current "schematic experience"tm in the least.
All it needs is ONE button somewhere to turn "connection safe" on or
off, with on as a default. That way people who don't want it can move on
blissfully unaware, people who want it can activate it and middle click their
way to connection joy or whatever.
If we get yet another window that does more then I could possibly ever need
(not to mention half of what it does would probably be the same of some other
window but worse) I'll get a retro-3D fit and ebay an amiga2000 to run silver
on.