Re: [!! SPAM] Re: rigid bodies slowness

[Matt Lowery <mattl(at)glassworks.co.uk>]

The good news is that my spam filter is obviously working, as it labeled 
all the replies to this thread as spam. With the exception of the first 
one ;-)

Thanks David, turning off the collision primitive does help, but it's 
still no where near as smooth as it should be. I guess I should know 
better... simulation and xsi are not good buddies.

m(at)


Eric Deren wrote:
> I'm glad I wasn't the only one who thought that.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "kim aldis" <xsi(at)kim-aldis.co.uk>
> To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 2:47 PM
> Subject: RE: [!! SPAM] Re: rigid bodies slowness
>
>
> > That sounds a lot like Chinny.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
> > > Behalf Of Halfdan Ingvarsson
> > > Sent: 13 March 2008 18:04
> > > To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> > > Subject: RE: [!! SPAM] Re: rigid bodies slowness
> > >
> > > Obligatory: http://tinyurl.com/3xxovp
> > >
> > >  - ½
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in 
> body:
> unsubscribe xsi

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi