Hi,
Anyone tried the FlexScan route. Looks good on paper/screen.
http://www.3d3solutions.com/flexscan3d.php
A.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
> [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Gianfranco Sgura
> Sent: 20 March 2008 12:36
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: Re: OT-ish - Image Modelling
>
> Oh LOL, and of course, I forgot to paste the link! Here it is:
>
> http://www.xsibase.com/scripts/modeling.php?detail=1395
>
> Gianfranco Sgura ha scritto:
> > Hi Adam, don't know if you'll find that useful for your
> pourposes, but
> > some time ago I've put on the Base a tool to help on these
> kind of tasks.
> > It's an epipolar constraint, and I've always found
> difficult to write
> > how it works...I'll try once again.
> > You need to have multiple pictures of the same object, and each
> > picture needs to be match-moved. Preferably you can have a sequence
> > shot in HD, and have it match-moved.
> > -You load this sequence in rotoscope in XSI and the m-moved
> camera as
> > well.
> > -Being on frame 10 (let's say), you start drawing your mesh
> using your
> > projected markers (or any visible detail) as reference. For
> precision
> > you can also zoom while drawing.
> > -When you're finished drawing, you select the points of the
> polymesh
> > and apply the operator.
> > Now, the op takes the position of the camera at frame 10,
> the position
> > of each point, and constraints these points to be on the
> line passing
> > by the camera center and the point itself.
> > -As a result, if you scrub to another frame and start moving the
> > points (M key ot Tag-translate) to match the corresponding
> locations
> > they where on frame 10, you end up with the model reconstructed.
> > Obviously the results of this technique are strongly tied with the
> > quality of the matchmoving itself.
> >
> > Unfortunately (or fortunately :) I'm under a constant pressure on
> > work, but as I find the time, I'm going to implement a pick
> position
> > for the last step of the modelling phase, avoiding the manual
> > translation of every points.
> >
> > Again, don't know if you'll find that usefull but....it's
> there if you
> > need it.
> > Cheers,
> > Gianfranco
> >
> >
> > Adam Seeley ha scritto:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Wondered what the general preference is for Photogrammetry
> software
> >> is (and the pros/cons of using it with XSI to reduce the OT a bit).
> >> It seems like it's a two horse race between Imagemodeler &
> Photomodeler.
> >>
> >> We have a car to model that we can take pics of but can't
> physically
> >> touch so I figured projecting markers onto the surface and
> employing
> >> some image modelling would give us the best shot at some physical
> >> accuracy. We also don't have enough time to setup and use
> an armature
> >> system either.
> >>
> >> Any voices of experience welcome.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Adam.
> >>
> >>
> >> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1335 -
> >> Release Date: 19/03/2008 09:54
> >>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
> following text in
> >> body:
> >> unsubscribe xsi
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---
> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> > body:
> > unsubscribe xsi
> >
> >
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following
> text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1335 - Release
> Date: 19/03/2008 09:54
>
>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.21.7/1335 - Release Date: 19/03/2008 09:54
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
